Manipulation and strategic communication differ in intent, honesty, mutual respect and outcome.

Intention: In manipulation, the intention is to intentionally influence or control someone for your own own interests, often without regard to the interests or welfare of the other person. In strategic communication, the intention is to communicate effectively with a particular goal in mind, such as reaching consensus, persuading others or solving problems. The goal is to create a win-win situation that benefits all parties.

Honesty: Manipulation can involve deception, deceit or withholding information to mislead and influence others. Strategic communication involves being honest and transparent in your communication, sharing information in a clear and effective way without manipulating or deceiving.

Mutual respect: Manipulation often does not consider the feelings, needs or boundaries of others, and can lead to abuse or harm to the relationship. Strategic communication considers the feelings, needs and boundaries of all involved, and strives for an open and respectful exchange of ideas and information.

Outcome: Manipulation can lead to short-term gains or benefits for the manipulator, but can be detrimental to the relationship and trust in the long run. Strategic communication seeks positive outcomes based on mutual understanding, trust and cooperation, which build and maintain lasting relationships.